 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aberdeen on Predictive Analytics &amp; BI =&gt; CEP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/index.php/2008/06/18/aberdeen-on-predictive-analytics-bi-cep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2008/06/18/aberdeen-on-predictive-analytics-bi-cep/</link>
	<description>Complex Event Processing (CEP)</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vincent</title>
		<link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2008/06/18/aberdeen-on-predictive-analytics-bi-cep/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2008/06/18/aberdeen-on-predictive-analytics-bi-cep/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>+1 on James' comment about Decision Processing / Management being key also. However, the distinction between "process driven" and "event driven" decisions is, shall we say, "unclear". Indeed, there is no problem in realizing that a process requirement for a decision can be handled as an event-driven decision (the event being: I need a decision at this process step). Even better is the realization that processes don;t actually *need* to stop at a step to take a decision: the actual rules can be executing in parallel with the process so the process engine just... carries on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 on James&#8217; comment about Decision Processing / Management being key also. However, the distinction between &#8220;process driven&#8221; and &#8220;event driven&#8221; decisions is, shall we say, &#8220;unclear&#8221;. Indeed, there is no problem in realizing that a process requirement for a decision can be handled as an event-driven decision (the event being: I need a decision at this process step). Even better is the realization that processes don;t actually *need* to stop at a step to take a decision: the actual rules can be executing in parallel with the process so the process engine just&#8230; carries on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Event processing and decisioning are complementary &#187; Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog</title>
		<link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2008/06/18/aberdeen-on-predictive-analytics-bi-cep/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Event processing and decisioning are complementary &#187; Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2008/06/18/aberdeen-on-predictive-analytics-bi-cep/#comment-181</guid>
		<description>[...] old friend Paul Vincent had an interesting post on Complex Event Processing - Aberdeen on Predictive Analytics &amp; BI =&gt; CEP - in which he talked about some of the drivers for BI sounding a lot like complex event processing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] old friend Paul Vincent had an interesting post on Complex Event Processing - Aberdeen on Predictive Analytics &amp; BI =&gt; CEP - in which he talked about some of the drivers for BI sounding a lot like complex event processing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
